Blog Tools
Edit your Blog
Build a Blog
RSS Feed
View Profile
« October 2009 »
S M T W T F S
1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
You are not logged in. Log in
Entries by Topic
All topics  «
Ben Miller -Biblical Foundations of Literature - English 240
Tuesday, 27 October 2009
class notes 10/27

Class Notes: 10/27/09

-We’re all thieves!!  Especially the MOON!!

 Biblical Reading – should be through the Old Testament, beginning New. 

-Next Test Nov. 17. 

-For today and Thursday: The Book of Job

-Keep Reading:

            -Frye Ch. 5 Seven aspects of the Bible; The Slave; and David Plotz.

-Start thinking about Term Paper: Perhaps, One, the way in which the Bible relates to The Slave. Or, Two, What I know now that I didn’t know before and the difference it makes.  There must be at least two references from Frye’s, Great Code.  And lastly, third, you may do a different topic that Dr. Sexson okays.  Term Paper criteria: 5 pages, formal format, cite outside sources, include works cited.

-BLOGS- 

            -Rio’s blog: a discussion with Natalie, her comment on “being trapped in our time period, with preconceived notions,” well written and inspiring. 

-Next assignment, read each other’s blogs and learn, blog about it.  It’s Fun! 

            -Natalie’s Blog: “The Book of Living Biblically,” by A.J. Jacobs, her thoughts after reading the introduction, how the author is going to “live biblically.”  Is it Possible? 

            -Alex Thomas: The Book of Susanna, and Stevens; with the help of Wikipedia, Shakespeare, research on paintings; The Musical Metaphor; carnal universals, desires, knowledge;

            -Eric’s blog: Reflection on poetry by John Donne. 

-Joni Mitchell’s Book of Job Song, the chorus as Job’s visitors; really neat, effective way of alternating visitors and Job.  Good Line, “Better I was carried from the wom to the grave.”  A really good song, period.

-Cowen Brothers movie, No Country For Old Men, from Cormac McCarthy’s book, from William Butler Yates’ poem.  Check out Cowen brother’s new movie, ‘A Serious Man,’ based on The Book of Job.

            -Jesse’s Blog: You Tube of David Plotz discussing the dumbest Jew he’s ever seen, Samson, the embarrassment;

            -You Tubes on The Book Of Job, from Alex’s blog; first The Traditional view, then the not-so-traditional view.  “Two wildly different treatments of the same source material.”  Entertaining and enlightening, Thanks Alex.     

-Jesus was a Jew, so what’s the deal with Christian’s anger that the Jews killed Jesus? He wasn’t even Christian!!

-THE BOOK OF JOB- An Oreo cookie, the goods are in the middle.

            -The Crust Material-

-Prologue- “The Lord Gives and The Lord Takes; Be Patient”  -Epilogue- “Patience Rewards twofold.” But we need the middle, the good stuff, the narrative, and the action.   

            -Frosting Begins in Chapter 3-

-Frenemies- close enemies.  –Retributive justice: good things for bad people, bad things for good people;

-Job curses the day he was born. “Let the day perish wherein I was born.” Ouch, pessimistic to the max!  A tragic sense of life.  Derrick’s comment, “The book of Job as a drama,” Plays of Escalus, “Prometheus Bound.” 

-Dark tragedy, the dark heart, to have never been born.

-“Why is light given to one who cannot see the way?”  False hope…

-Get movie, “My Dinner With Andre.”  Incredibly gripping conversation.             

-Movie- “Iris;”

-Human beings are born to trouble.

The prologue and epilogue as the fairy tale Job, which most traditional view buy into. 

-Talmud- Google it.      


Posted by bmcycleski at 2:14 PM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Thursday, 22 October 2009
Thursday notes

Class notes: 10-22

Movie Reflection:

-History = his story.  Story=mythos; The story is more important than the history.  The Jews were able to remain religious and faithful by the story, keeping the story alive about their religion while in exile.

-Read Plotz and you’ll be prepared for the test.

Important chapter from Frye for next test: Chapter 5.

-1st king of Israel: Saul. 2nd King: David.

  -Exceptionally long timeline that the bible was composed, from 2000b.c. to the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls, in 1945.

-Highbrow vs. Lowbrow literature, wisdom, and life. 

-Prudential – lowbrow, meant to have practical advice. Proverbs: spare the rod and spoil the child, a penny saved is a penny earned, a watched pot never boils

-Speculative/skeptical – highbrow;

-Wisdom can only be communicated,

* We’ve been brainwashed to think language must be clear and descriptive, rather than ornamented, elegant, and metaphorical. *

-The bible can be described with the U, the parabola, the u shaped narrative.  Start high, slide down to the bottom of some experience and work back up. Parables of Jesus; the unexpected.  

-Dickinson, “tell the truth, but tell it slant.”

-Like that was awesome, like awfully cool, like so totally badass, doode.   

-There is a distinction between wisdom and knowledge.

-Book by Harold Bloom: “Where Shall Wisdom Be Found”

-Wisdom: The things that people come to understand that penetrate the mysteries of life that are often, unfortunately, negative. 

-Rio’s godly hands.     

-Frye page 121, In the book of proverbs 19:18, “…responsible for more physical pain than any other sentence ever written. “  Spanking.

-The father’s advice to his daughter, “don’ talk to boys!” Polonius giving advice to Ophelia, “don’t talk to Hamlet.”  But Polonius tells his son, “have good table manners, and watch out for these three things, wine, women, and song.”

-The Book of Job, and Ecclesiastes, exemplary books that deal with wisdom.  Skeptical books.  “Vanity of Vanities; all is vanity”  Everything  is vain, futile, in the end we’re all food for the worms. 

-The book of Job is like an Oreo cookie.  First the prologue, than at the end the epilogue, but in the middle, the good stuff, Job, whining, bitching, dealing with everything. 

-The question of questions:

-Theodicy, the attempts to justify suffering through God

-Tragedies, dealing with pain, the dark heart of skeptical wisdom.  Somewhere, someday, maybe the suffering of a child can be explained, perhaps for future generations to learn from and reach higher levels of peace and tranquility.   Yet the brother, from Dostoyevsky’s novel, says he’ll, “humbly return his ticket” rather than have gods justify the suffering and pain of a child.  It’s too horrific. 

-Skeptical wisdom even acknowledges that wisdom is vain, along with everything else.

-“There’s nothing new under the sun.”  “Eat drink and be marry, for tomorrow we die.”  Carpe Diem – Seize the day!!!

-Check Jamie’s blog for musical enlightenment. 

-Read nicks blog on music.  Music is everywhere.  The Whole earth is a conductor of music.  All music, all the time, 24/7/365. 

-The greatest passage of literature Dr. Sexson has ever read: the last part of the book of Ecclesiastes; 12:1-8.  Enormously consoling.; Everybody’s in the same boat with a slow leak, so let’s look out for each other. 

Daily statistics: 

-One person has eaten Oreos, me.

-Three to four people know of children who’ve been abused.

-Eight to ten people have had a dog or puppy die  

  


Posted by bmcycleski at 2:12 PM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Tuesday, 20 October 2009

Class Notes: 10/20/09

-Read Book or Job and Susanna, compare Stevens and Susanna; read The Slave; there's a lot to do.  

-A skimpy class today, is everyone sick?  If so, stay away! 

-Reading the whole bible: perhaps the biggest literary challenge ever, a chore or sorts.

-A Nova Clip: sophisticated smart clip

The P writer arrived late on the scene, had hard task of putting everything together. 

Possible answer to how the Jews survived. 

Invention of writing, Semitic, a Venetian intention, perfected in Greece and Rome,

Art and biblical themes,

Frye:

Page 50, top of page, Israelites and Moses were not black, but were slaves, people in bondage, and so black slaves were mythological ancestors of the Israelites, the archetype of the slave, trying to be free of bondage.

Missoula Montana, fishing, Funk, the bible, myth and fact.  The Jesus Seminar, Project.

The two German Words, in Frye, page 50, Holy History and Actual History; the holy history is way more interesting.  “Before Karen was born there were omens in the sky, celestial phenomena that portended some amazing event was going to happen, Karen was born and immediately jumped out of her crib and shot a polar Bear!!”

Page 50 cont: “traditional language would say that Myth redeems history”  “Easiest to see in Myths of deliverance” the biggest myth of deliverance: the bible.  

The Mobile God in a box, the arc of the covenant.  Thanks Indiana Jones.

Read Susanna in the apocrypha, a.s.a.p. 

Biblical tales are constantly influencing literature, millions of examples. Absalom, Absalom.  Any canonical text is going to relate to or reference the bible. 

A bit of world history from the clip; Joshua, a military story; The Hill of the Foreskins – what an image; Judges 11 or 12, grotesque; Ruth will be presented by a group; Samuel, great literary book; David, great stories of David, sees Bathsheba, He wants her!  David arranged for her husband to get killed in war so he gets the woman.  Solomon, associated with wisdom, judicial decisions, the wisdom of Solomon, he has 1000 wives, builds the greatest temple to Yahweh; Kings, similar to Shakespeare’s early plays. Early history, one story, story of greed and power, slavery, kings, presidents.

-Movie, very good, part documentary, part cinematic performance;

-The book of Susanna, artist depictions. 

-Frye’s attempt to examine the bible as a poet would want to understand it, in The Great Code.

Three greatest tragedies ever written, the worst that could ever happen, especially innocent suffering: King Lear, Shakespeare; The Brothers Karamazov, Dostoyevsky; 

The Book of Job: Poetic testament to the nature of suffering; how the Israelites managed to continue faith in exile. “Why do innocent people suffer?”  Job’s suffering, boils, friend say he probably did something wrong.  Could that be? Greatness of Job determined by possessions, hmm, interesting 

-The popular culture theory of Job: the patience of Job, but Job’s not patient at all, these people have never read the bible. 

-The biblical Satan: an accuser, as in a trial, the devils advocate always bringing up the contrary view.  

-Job’s possessions stolen, a really bad day, servants die, but his wife remains with him, not part of the punishment. 

            


Posted by bmcycleski at 2:15 PM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Monday, 19 October 2009
What a weekend.. Reflected with the help of Stevens, Food, and Music

            What a weekend.  I expect this blog will be as random, confusing, and perhaps interesting as my weekend.  This could well be my blog that wraps up the good day, the bad day, Wallace Stevens, food, Nicks blog, Don Quixote, and maybe a dash of Frank Zappa; why not? 

            For starters I must confess that I’m behind in my biblical reading, not as bad on my Frye, and have pretty much completely disregarded Plotz and supplemented Nick’s blog.  For some damn reason I cannot get myself into the swing of this semester; senioritis is definitely a part of the cause, relationship trouble another part, not ever having a day off due to school during the week and cooking on the weekends, three lit classes, and the all around anxiousness for winter to completely arrive so I can submerse myself in some cold smoke powder.  Am I whining, complaining, and making excuses?  Yes.  But mostly venting, venting some much needed thoughts under extreme pressure. Pftchsssss… Ahh, a bit better already.

            A friend, and new roommate, of mine introduced me to Frank Zappa earlier this year; not actually Frank, he’s dead, but at least his insurmountable plethora of quirky, insightful music.  For those of you who aren’t familiar with Zappa it’s 

probably because he was way before our time and even his.  He lived from 1940-1993 and wrote, directed, conducted, performed, and produced over 70 albums and a handful of movies.  Yet surprisingly he’s not an immensely popular, at least for modern standards, musician, but in his day he was the essence of a rock star.  Anyway, Zappa has a song, a long song called The Adventures of Greggery Peccary, and depending on the version and album, it’s usually four movements long.  Now, Greggery Peccary is a pig.  He’s a pig that goes on adventures, but the song, the version I listened to, was an instrumental and so the music influenced the listeners imagined images of Greggery’s adventures.  Well, this got me thinking: adventures in movements, parts, divisions; Don Quixote, Cervantes epic, is also a story of adventures in two parts.  And Quixote’s adventures are nothing short of outrageous, funny, yet serenely insightful and truly sublime. 

The best part: the second half of Don Quixote continues from the first, with the same characters, settings, and an onslaught of adventures, but there’s one big difference; everyone IN the story has read the first part of Quixote’s epic adventures, and knows how silly Quixote can be and easily manipulated and gullible he is.  A step further, albeit a shaky, rather somewhat absurd step, consider the bible: The Old Testament and The New; two parts, an original set of little books (adventures) and then updated, creating an incredibly similar set of new little books (adventures).  I cannot help myself from believing that Cervantes was to some extent parodying the bible: a first book of outrageous adventures that people believed in, and then a second that continues the ridiculousness with even more believers.  At first in Don Quixote it seems as if the people involved in the knight errands affairs are purely poking fun at him, taking him for a fool, comic, and someone who isn’t in touch with “reality;” yet in the second part everyone is more involved and a part of making Quixote’s reality as outrageous as it is; in a sense they partake in his foolery as much as him, creating the reality they think is so absurd.  Very clever, and curious.

            (Right now as I write this, two grown men started into prayer after having coffee and conversation together at the table next to me, whoa.)

            Curious about the Wallace Stevens poem Dr. Sexson mentioned, I clicked on to Nick’s post about Susanna and Wallace, which he begins by saying, “I have often heard from scholars' words that truly the universe is vibrations.”  Immediately I was reminded of a paper I wrote a year or two ago about poems by Wordsworth, “Intimations of Immortality,” and Percy Shelley, “Hymn to Intellectual Beauty,” which both contain wonderful poetry about an “awful shadow of some unseen Power,” where “every common sight / To [them] did seem / Apparell’d in celestial light / The Glory and the freshness of a dream.” Nick’s entry has an abundance of entertaining examples of how things are vibrations, then goes on to write, “Matter is, in a sense, a great melody.”  And is right by saying that “there’s music in everything.”  A vibration resonates, sound soothes, feelings are tamed or executed, an array of vibrations releases resonances. 

            Earlier this summer I went on a hike.  After a mile or so on the main trail I branched left, straight up a steep hillside to the top of the ridge, a fairly brutal hike.  On the way down I stopped at a couple interesting rock formations jutting out of the hillside.  When I was done exploring a second formation I sat down on the hillside for a water break.  It was evening time, a couple hours from sunset; the air was calm, plants green, and canyon walls gorgeous.  As I was looking around taking the landscape in a decent size rock started tumbling down the hillside, about 100 yards away from me.  It was at about the same elevation and rolled for 60 yards or so before coming to a stop.  I was kind of baffled.  There were no animals on the hillside, no birds around, only me and a rock rolling down the mountain; I was so curious how it started rooling.  I half laughed, half sighed and honestly thought of Percy Shelley’s Hymn, the “Power / Floats though unseen among us, - visiting / This various world with as inconstant wing / As summer winds that creep from flower to flower.”  The earth had vibrated, shifted, resonated, moved, gasped or been overcome by an unseen Power and sent this rock rolling along. 

            Wallace Steven’s poem “The Idea of Order at Key West” also deals with “it,” the power or force from a dream.  “Whose spirit is this?” Stevens writes;  “If it was only the dark voice of the sea, that rose, or even colored by man waves; if it was only the outer voice of the sky, and cloud, of the sunken coral water walled…” Needless to say the poem is terrific, and Stevens goes on to write, “It 

was her voice that made the sky acutest at its vanishing.” Stevens certainly emphasizes the vocal resonances of the unseen power, one that through the woman’s singing creates the world beyond belief, imagination, and nearly poetry.  It’s notable that Stevens chooses Susanna, a biblical woman for his Peter Quince poem and that the singer in The Idea of Order is female.  At the end of his post Nick mentions the important role and element of female empowerment.  Peter Quince is quite a poem and I definitely don’t think I can do it justice but I do love the beginning, the “music is feeling, then, not sound; and thus it is that what I feel, here in this room, desiring you.”  This is a gorgeous opening, comparing the beauty and desire a woman emits to the sounds and feelings of music, vibrations.  And in the Idea poem, the woman is the singer, the maker, “and singing made.”  In a way women are more metaphorically godly because they can give birth; they keep the melody of vibrations in constant flux.  And all the meanwhile they’re purposefully creating confusion for the male who can never rise above his animalistic, savage, bawdy, impulses.  Clever women. 

            Yeah, you may have noticed I have no idea how I’m going to tie this all back around to the bible, perhaps it will unconsciously on its own.  I was getting a bit tired of Dr. Sexson referring to my long repetitive parallelism entry – I don’t want that to be what I ’m remembered for, it wouldn’t be worthy to have a legacy of repeating things directly below each other.  Therefore, I have to figure out how else I can biblically extend this post. Ahh, yes. I still have yet to tell you the story.

            In the mornings on the weekend I cook at a small, local calfe; you have to find it to experience it.  This weekend, Saturday morning sometime around 10, 11, or 12 to be exact, I found my self in an uncommon situation.  For starters, I was a bit out of it Saturday morning for obvious college reasons.  The day began mellow enough, then I got slightly reprimanded overcooking potatoes, and then it started getting busy.

            When it started getting busy I noticed Tim, a hilarious, jolly, stubborn old man walked in and took a seat near the grill, by me.  Now, Tim is old, a bit ornery –we hear from his daughter – and has to be on oxygen all the time.  He still drives for some reason, but the best part is he drives a small red pickup truck with two large, large oxygen tanks mounted on each side of the bed of the truck: an genuine red rocket truck.  He won’t et his family “put him up in home,” he loves to be independent, socialize and go out to eat on the weekends.  This weekend was nearly his last. 

            After cooking through a little rush, I went into the back to get something from the fridge.  I’d fed Tim a while ago, and a number of other customers too, and I need to restock the grill area for the next round.  When I was in the back room, I heard Tim start coughing, harshly and forcefully.  I walked out to the grill and he was still heaving, coughing really bad, eyes closed, hand at his mouth, grunting, gurgling, coughing, choking.  He face was starting to discolor a bit; I walked straight over to him, said, “Tim are you breathing?”  He didn’t really nod yes or no, kept coughing a really strange nasty cough that didn’t seem to be getting better.  He didn’t seem to be full-on choking, but the cough was terrible, not getting better.  He’s old, I was concerned about hurting him if I did the Heimlich, but I was not about to watch someone choke to death on the food I made them.  I did give Tim the Heimlich, lightly and stopped.  He was still coughing badly; the Heimlich didn’t seem to help.  By now quite a few people are concerned.  Then his cough changes, he nods, murmurs, and breathes.  Whether or not I “saved” or helped Tim through his misbite may never be known.  He didn’t seem to acknowledge either way whether he really did need the Heimlich, but I could tell he was glad it didn’t happen to him alone.

            And my day kept going.  It was actually my mother’s birthday and we had some relatives in town, we all went out for a nice dinner at Over The Tapas.  If you’ve ever been to Tapas, you know it’s a bit cramped.  Well I was seated with my back to the isle, and when the buss boy, or host, I’m not sure he wasn’t our server, brought our waters – right after we were seated – he spills one all over my shoulder, and fairly nice shirt, for me.  Okay, no big deal, its just water.  I get my beer, I’m happy, and food arrives and I eat. 

            When the waitress spouts off the deserts, I ask her to go over the frosting on the cupcakes again, I missed ‘em.  She says, “Almont butter, pistachio butter, and chocolate delght.”

            I quickly decide, “I’ll take the almond butter please.” 

            She nods, goes to walk away, stops, turns back to me and says, “I’m so sorry, we’re out of almond butter, I forgot…” 

            She’s horrified, humiliated, and I kind of laugh.  “I’ll take the pistachio, that’s fine.”

            “Okay, I’m sorry, I get that right out,” she stammers.

 It was the perfect way to end the long, odd one that began 12 hours before the cupcake arrived. Hope that was a long enough, and erratic enough, blog to beat my repetitive parallelism entry.  It certainly took me long enough.                         


Posted by bmcycleski at 10:38 PM EDT
Updated: Monday, 19 October 2009 10:52 PM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Thursday, 15 October 2009

Class Notes: 10-15-09

-Stay Healthy!  Watch out for puking pigs.

-Blogs to check: Nick, Alex, Natalie, Ty, Jenna, and the rest of our class; lot of good insights and musings. 

-The battle between P and J, a never-ending one; The P writer and people who relate usually think of the bible as a book of rules, the Ten Commandments, Deuteronomy; The J writer and people who relate usually think of the bible as a book of stories, narratives, and images.

-The Book of Deuteronomy, not a narrative, but a book of form that still has unity, unity of thought, and doesn’t contain many lacunas.  The Selah, the opening prayer at religious services, pulled from Deuteronomy.  Commandments of all commandments: One Lord, you shall not worship any other Lord. 

-Law, a subset of literature, literature as the uses of language.  And so even the book of Deuteronomy can be read as literature; and stories can be read as rules to live by.

-Michelangelo’s sculpture of Moses with horns, mistranslated from radiant.  Bloom’s comment, “there is no correct reading of anything, only misreading.”

-And the way to correct our understanding of possible mistranslations is to, well, read, read the bible and see what it literally, letterally says.

-The Ten Commandments; do they even exist in the bible as a strict set of rules?  Or are they merely mistranslated or mistakenly thought to be laid-out in the bible?  Plotz recognizes the ambiguousness of the commandments, sometimes there are 10, in other places there’s 16, or even 6. 

-The Bozeman trial, from last year, of someone coveting their neighbors donkey, they were sentenced to death!!

-Check the website, Ask Dr. Laura and respond to the questions.  Also, get the book, “The Year of Living Biblically.”  Is it possible?  The first dilemma, are clothes Kosher? 

-Leviticus 18:22 the issue of homosexuality.  Biblically, it’s an abomination, that’s that.  But what about all the other rules… they must stand too! 

- Deuteronomy 22; the issue of the virgin wife; reminds me of “The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson, the penalty of stoning.  Same penalty for a misbehaving child. 

-January 1965, Sexson began teaching, and he can remember the names of every student. Go! 

-Finding the boring fascinating; lists, names, reading the bible; Why is it so hard to transform from boring to fascinating?  What is the dilemma?  We’re not interesting enough; next assignment, become more interesting, and the bible will become less bored with you, and especially me.  The main problem: all of society has ADD; we can’t focus on one thing for more than a television commercial, less than a minute.

-Jenna’s blog:  God’s Backside, Moses witnesses God streaking.  Moses didn’t see God face to face, as people interpret.  She continues to discuss her experience in church when the pastor brought up the sin of divorce and remarriage.  A collision between what the bible says and personal experiences that contradict the bible.  The epiphany that it’s ok to question God. 

-epiphany: a sudden manifestation of the divine, divine thought or a supernatural being; not finding car keys. 

- The Job question –Theodicy: the vindication of divine goodness and providence in view of the existence of evil.

-We ask, “Why me?”  God answers, “because you pissed me off.” 

-Derrick’s scar story, getting hit by a car on the way to work. 


Posted by bmcycleski at 2:12 PM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Tuesday, 13 October 2009
class notes 10/13

Class Notes 10/13/09

 -Test average: 80.4% B-

 *One bible reader is already at the book of Job!  Nicely done Alesha!  Everyone better catch up!

 *Next blog assignment: make a connection between a biblical story and a modern poem or piece of literature. 

 The book of Susana, in the apocrypha, and the Wallace Stevens poem, Peter Quince at the Clavier; Blog about it, Stevens is connecting Shakespeare and the Bible, the Book of Susanna

 -Dialectic tradition means the old stories are the good stories, even the traditional biblical stories. 

 Have a Bad Day, instead of Good… blog about it.

 A 1940’s movie clip: a girl who’s not supposed to be in the family playing the piano, and a young man singing, then everybody joins in and she realizes the family does this often, without her.

 Plotz’s book on tape, about God’s continuation to keep the Egyptians suffering and continue afflicting plagues so that stories develop and people tell them for centuries and centuries.  Plotz criticizes God harshly without any consideration about the story, the importance of God’s role to the narrative, similar to gods controlling and afflicting people in mythology.  Plot’s bringing more of a modern sensibility (Nick’s blog) about the morality of God’s actions, rather than a more literary sensibility to the narrative and stories of the Bible. 

 Moses as a paradigm, a model, an archetype, a mythic character that the times talked about; How Moses Shaped America; Moses as superman, Obama; the people as the murmurers. 

 -Frye passage on page 49, “Exodus as the myth of deliverance of Israel from Egypt.”         

            -Moses as an archetypal, mythological character rather than an historical, real, true character – except by letterally being arranged in language.  “The symbolic Egypt  is not in history;” 

 Moses’ mythological elements, myth of the hero: birth circumstances important, conception circumstances unusual, threatened to be killed at birth, spirited away and raised in obscurity, meets an adversary, overcome it or is overcome, meets woman and marries her, becomes king and gains people loyalty, then people challenge king, and ultimately hero dies, usually on mountain. 

-Similar hero myths: Hercules, Superman, Jesus, Harry Potter, Ovid, and many many others.

 -“Go Down Moses” African American spiritual, straight from Exodus; two songs by Louie Armstrong and Paul Robeson.  Armstrong’s version: blends of spiritual chant, blues, and swing music, with chorale backup singers.  Robinson’s version: very deep, dark, powerful voice accompanied by piano music.  Then a bluegrass version, Ralph Stanley, of the encounter of Moses at the burning bush, “I spoke to Moses at the Burning Bush, Take you’re shoes off Moses, you’re on Holy Ground.

 -Ten commandments: no other gods before God, you shall not make any graven images, don’t use the lords name in vain, remember the Sabbath and keep it holy, honor your father and mother, No stealing, no killing, no coveting neighbors wives, do not commit adultery, do not bear false witness on neighbors.   

*What justifies Literature?  According to Frye: narrative, story, and image. 

 -Iconoclasm: Greek for ‘image-breaking’; rejection or destruction of religious images as heretical. 

GOD STREAKS!!


Posted by bmcycleski at 2:16 PM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Tuesday, 6 October 2009
The class period before the TEST!!

Test Material: Test, Thursday 10-8,

-The Bible: Genesis

-Classroom Discussions: Check Blogs, Tom and this one

-Frye: Chapters 1 & 2

-Women and Bible lecture, Dr. Lynda Sexson

-David Plotz: Genesis

-Peer Blogs

 Genesis: Chapter 38

-Lacuna, why did the lord slay Er, Judah’s firstborn.  Judah’s other son must go unto Er’s wife, but Onan doesn’t want to – Wuss.  And so the Lord slays him too.  What’s Er’s wife gonna do?  She pretends to be a temple prostitute, sacred prostitute.

 Kugal and Berlinerb, call the bible junk sculpture and pastisch

 Frye: bricolage: borrowing something here, borrowing something there. But that isn’t a bad thing, perhaps better, showing the unifying forces of these archetypes and mythos.  Plotz thinks otherwise. 

 Genesis 42, 43: Joseph’s Brothers go to Egypt, Benjamin

-Benjamin getting handed around, keeping the game going, very narrative language, the J writer at her best.

 Repetition in the bible is necessary, mandatory, deal with it.

Literature- to keep the game going

 *Shift to a novel, Thomas Mann, a big novel that fills in the lacunas. *   What’s better? The Lacunas or the details? Both?

 Remember for Frye, ch. 3, Joseph is a fruitful Bow

 Test Question/Material:

1.    The two authors of creation stories in genesis, J, P; God in his PJ’s

2.    JEDPR

3.    First five books of the bible: Torah, Pentateuch.  Genesis, Exodus, Levitucus, numbers Deuteronoy,

4.    Torah, Nebahim, Ketuvim, Torah, Law, prophets, writing

5.    Abraham, Isaac, Jacob; three patriarchs. 

6.    How many sons did Jacob have? 12; which two are by the wife he wanted, Rachel, Joe and Ben.

7.    What did Lynda think of Plotz? She hated him.  Plotz thinks women are prostitutes, Lynda says they’re feminine metaphors of power, deception

8.    Hosea: married a harlot, Israel is a harlot.

9.    Lynda’s view of Lots daughters, passion and respect to procreate father’s seed.

10. Carl Eats Little Whinny Puppies with Gravy Asparagus:  Creation, Exodus, Law, Wisdom, Prophecy, Gospel, Apocalypse

11. Vico’s ages: gods, heroes, men; Frye’s correlating stages of language: metaphor, metonymic, descriptive (demotic).   *Frye says we should read the bible literally, as a child, what the text says is what it means, believe it for the sake or mythos, narrative

12. Mythos; Greek for “story”

13.  Repetitive Parallelism, ex. Handsome and good looking.

14. Psalm 51, the boy hitting the high note.

15. Circumcision, biblical meaning, physical reminder of the covenant, sacrifice to God.  Dr. Sexson’s mutilation of student’s earlobes,

16. Lacuna: Gaps in the text

17. Difference between Homer (not Simpson) and the bible: Homer describes everything, the bible leaves lacunas

18.  Kerygma: revelation, a kind of language that blends revelation and proclamation. 

19. Logos: story, words; has come to mean fact, truth; perhaps a true story about a talking snake. 

20. Psyche: today means mind, back then meant “soul”.

21. Example of etiology: how did the elephant get its trunk, why do women give birth in pain? She listened to the snake.  Why do snakes crawl on their bellies? Because the snake tempted, tricked Adam and Eve.

22. Archetype: a model narrative.   Cain: archetype of fugitive. 

23. Gnosticism: theology of philosophy, which locates salvation in knowledge. –Great definition Dr. Sexson.  Movie: “The Man Who Fell to Earth,” See it. 

24. Critical approach vs. traditional approach to the bible; critical = literary, scholarly approach; traditional = faith

25. Hubris: Tower of Babel, people who are to arrogant, excessive pride, so God jumbles their language.

26. Documentary Hypothesis: the first five books of the bile written by multiple authors.  In a nutshell: that there were multiple authors of the bible.

27. Blogs: check the ones that have been brought up in class.  Jason’s blog: colorful and inventive strategies to deal with hyperboles of bibles, but Jason explains that it’s metaphorical language; Occam’s Razor: the most likely answer is the simplest one.  Nick’s blog on “The Lonely God”

28. Women in the bible, what were the writers worried about? Social Justice, Cultic purity, False Gods

29. Archetypes of Eve and Mary of women in the bible.       

 

 


Posted by bmcycleski at 2:11 PM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Thursday, 1 October 2009
Women and The Bible, Oct. 1

Women and the Bible

-Women, as a metaphor, not worried about biology, but metaphors of the feminine and the social conditions of women

Metaphor = literary condition; women = social condition; but porous and influences each other

-Aristotle’s definition of metaphor: “giving a name for one thing to something else.” 

-Eve: a feminine metaphor

-The Tanak as a library, compiled over thousands of years.

Attitude towards women in the Hebrew bible: patriarchal = patro(father) archy(rules)

            Women are women, and all men are women…. 

            -Gender asymmetry: culture is uneven, on top are metaphors of masculinity, on bottom are metaphors of femininity.

-Today, we are living in the disillusion of patriarchy.  

Lot and His daughters – in the cave on the mountain, another beginning, start of creation; women and the bible constantly worried about procreation. Both daughters sleep with father to continue their kin.  The most important thing, to preserve the father’s seed. 

-The feminine associated with sexuality in two ways: procreation and sin.  Feminine Metaphors vs. Women.   Control of women in order to control the babies.

-Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob; the founders, the focus of Genesis.  Yet the Women, Sarah, Leah, Rachel, are the pivotal characters in the stories.

-Husband and wife vs. Man and wife.  Contemporary labels vs. patriarchy labels. 

Genesis 29 – detail about the well, the stone covering the well, Laban and Jacob, masculine and feminine. Jacob’s smooth face. 

-Lynda’s rule #12; women in a patriarchy are not despised but feared because they are so powerful.

Teraphim: household gods, deeds to the property. Women… Laban angry that his daughters ran away with Jacob, Rachel had the household gods in her camel saddle, Laban wants to search her tent but she’s “in the way of women.” Men scared, worried about women’s menstruation.

New TESTament,  Old TESTament.  Circumcision, a vow, a man of hid word.

-Jeptha’s daughter, Judges 11

-Numbers 30 – if the men make a vow to the Lord they can never break it; if a woman makes a vow, it can be broken according to her father.  Patriarchy. 

-Prophets, writing begin in 8th century BCE, pure Yahweh-ists, can’t have any outside contamination; believe the way to worship is to be good to one another. 

            -Yahweh to Amis: I hate and despise your feast days.  The way to worship is not to cut up and eat animals but to be good to one another.

                   1. social justice; 2. Cultic purity.

Hosea: Yahweh to Hosea: “Go take a wife of whoredom.” an unworthy woman.  Why?  Israel likened to a woman, which means she is unfaithful. Hosea then becomes the wronged, noble husband.

Unike Plotz who thinks biblical women are prostitutes; the Women are deviating sexually as a performance of Israel deviating Yahweh.

Jeremiah: 7:18 women kneading dough to make cakes for the queen of heaven. (vulva cakes) the essence of the body, the eating of the god. Yahweh is pissed.

44:15 – not everyone agrees with the Yahweh-ism.  Town doesn’t want to listen.

“One religion in the whole world: patriarchy” A biblical scholar, unfortunately didn’t catch her name.  


Posted by bmcycleski at 2:11 PM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Wednesday, 30 September 2009
Class Notes 9-29, the day before it snowed

Mandatory attendance Thursday Oct. 1!  Women in the BibleExam next Thursday, Fyre Chapters 1-3

Read “Odysseus's Scar”

-Hermeneutics: science of interpretation especially with the bible; Hermes, the god of messages.

-Fletcher’s Blog:  rewrite of Genesis 22, with the lacunas filled in.  Check it out.

-The Cities of the Plain: The cities of Sodom and Gamorrah; inspiration for many writers including Proust, and Cormac McCarthy. 

-Don’t use the word “just,” it diminishes the value of whatever it’s talking about.  Just is just stupid. 

-Kierkegaard: Danish philosopher, “Fear and Trembling and the Sickness unto Death”

-Sodomy, unnatural sexual practices

-Visitations from the divine, visitations from the K-9!

-Contradictory Abraham, which leads to Lot and his daughters.

-19:8 - Lot tells the men to do what they want with his daughters not his men. 

-DO NOT LOOK:  The story of Acteon, who looked at the naked woman in the pool.

-Lot’s wife looks back and is turned into a pillar of salt. 19:26

“Bland old Isaac;” Jacob the trickster; The Bed Trick – the ol’ switcher-oo; 

-Jacob’s wrestling match – with whom?  An angel, a man?  It doesn’t say angel, only man.  But where did this man come from? Jacob’s hip thrown-out; the man tells him his name is changed to Israel. New name, new personality

-Genesis 34; The Rape of Dinah – Plotz’s inspiration for writing his book, he was stunned to read The Rape of Dinah.

-Carpe Diem: make the most of the present time and give little thought to the future. 

Joseph and His Brothers aka Sibling Rivalry

- Joseph, a round character, intricate, complex, human, silly because he’s young.

-Joseph is sold into slavery in Egypt by the Midianites.  Repetitive Parallelism of what Joseph looks like, his attributes, ‘handsome and good-looking,’ a true boy scout.

-The False accusation against Joseph that he raped the master’s wife; the chaste youth and the amorous woman.’  Joseph interprets dreams, first the Pharaoh’s servants in prison, than the Pharaoh’s dreams.  


Posted by bmcycleski at 7:11 PM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Tuesday, 29 September 2009
Zoar and The Lot Girls

            As I slowly creep through the first books of The Hebrew Scriptures, the beginning books of the Torah, the law, I am constantly surprised, intrigued, and curious.  And I’ll be honest it’s not easy going.  I find it absolutely incredible how much information and the amount of stories that are crammed into two tiny columns, only a few pages.  The Bible, full of it’s little books, astonishes me now.  Rather than a religious text, it seems to me more of an encyclopedia of short stories and lists that pertain to the history of humans.  I guess I’ll never get over the whole absurdity of attributing the initial creation to one powerful, angelic man; and the fact that millions of people live their lives strictly by how the bible tells them too; however, as a text, a book of words, I have gained a little respect for the Bible with the little bit of reading I’ve done thus far – it is after all a BIG book.

 

This entry will be somewhat random on purpose.  As I read I marked or underlined certain passages, ones I found interesting, weird, entertaining, and such.  So sit back, relax if you can, and enjoy some rather rambling reflections with Genesis.

 

Gen. 18:27 – “And Abraham answered and said, Behold now, I have taken upon me to speak unto the Lord, which am but dust and ashes:” Hmm, dust and ashes.  This seems to be mentioned only in passing at this point in the bible, when the Lord tells Abraham he will spare the city if so many righteous people live there.  But dust and ashes; this of course reminds me of Phillip Pullman’s “His Dark Materials.” In this trilogy the dust represents more or less the knowledge of good and evil.  Kids retain their pure, innocent dust until they reach adulthood and become sexually experienced. There’s much more to the dust in Pullman’s work, but for now I’m satisfied to have an idea of where it came from in the bible. 

 

Gen. 19 – For starters, I must say that it was in this chapter in Genesis that I discovered the name for my Inland Bearded Dragon (a pet reptile I have), and he will be now known as Zoar.  This is also the chapter that I realized that the women in the bible are unique, much more so than the man.  I’m looking forward to Thursday’s class when more will be discussed about biblical women.  In chapter 19, The Lot Girls are quite intriguing.  After God destroys the cities of the plain and sends ‘Lot out of the midst of the overthrow, when he overthrew the cities in the which lot dwelt.’ Lot runs to the mountains above Zoar with his two daughters.  And what happens next?  Yup, sex.  The Bible loves sex.  But interestingly enough, it’s not the man who initiates anything but the women, and in Lot’s case his daughters!! 

            Now, I guess there isn’t much else to do when you’re hiding out in the mountains, but this is a family, a father and his two daughters!  Yet the girls decide to get their father drunk and take advantage of him!!  Both of them!!  Earlier in the chapter Lot also acknowledges that his daughters are virgins; not only do they have their father’s children, but their father is their first sexual partner!  Whoa, I guess incest is a bit of an understatement, maybe this was some sort of fetish the women of Lot’s family had, I don’t know but it’s rather odd – though I’m sure Lot didn’t mind, his cities just got destroyed, he fled up onto a mountain, and now his two gorgeous virgin daughters want to have his babies.  But why?  “The firstborn said unto the younger, Our father is old, and there is not a man in the earth to come in unto us after the manner of all the earth: 32 Come, let us make our father drink wine, and we will lie with him, that he we may preserves seed of our father.”  It makes sense that the family wants their heritage to continue, but for the women to sleep with their father?  Perhaps this is where the phrase ‘daddy’s girl’ really originated.  Because it is certainly Lot’s daughters who take things into their own hands, literally, and who make a major decision that should probably be consulted with God. Yet God doesn’t intervene, interesting.    

 

            I’ll have to come back to this later.  The next passage I think I’ll examine is the story of Isaac, Jacob, and Esau, which takes up chapters 27 – 35 where there are many other women who display similar traits as that of The Lot Girls.    


Posted by bmcycleski at 12:39 PM EDT
Updated: Tuesday, 29 September 2009 12:43 PM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink

Newer | Latest | Older